• Login

The top 20 recruitment myths and why they are all untrue!

 

This post was originally inspired by an an article I read within one of the LinkedIn groups I am a member of. Then the inspiration took a mad turn……. after I posted an innocent question on Twitter this morning, asking what recruitment myths are a load of rubbish!!

In the original article, Rebecca Sargeant, talks about the biggest summer rumour of all - No one recruits in the summer.  Obviously, we all know that while it slows down in the summer, recruitment doesn't stop just because of the holiday season - after all not everyone has the same two weeks off do they?

Thanks to all the people that responded on Twitter today, because it has just expanded some of the things I was going to say! So here is a comprehensive list of recruitment myths that are complete bunkum:

  1. No-one recruits in the summer. Read the post by Rebecca, as she is right. But the verdict from me is that it is bunkum - recruitment slows down and decision makers are hard to track down, but it still goes on!
  2. Cover letters make a big difference. No they don't!! The only people that will tell you different are the career coaches that write them for a living, and all the 'older' candidates who do them, because they always have. If the content is good enough for a 'super' cover letter then put it in the CV!
  3. Attaching (or embedding) a photo of yourself on a CV will enhance your application. For the models maybe (and maybe the entertainment industry), but for the vast majority of roles it may even have an adverse effect. (Check out my previous blog post to see what I mean.) My advice, don't do it!
  4. Recruiters will call you back about a job. (via @andybold) This is so wrong but it happens - they promise to call you back about a job, but they never do. Don't take it personally they don't call anyone back!! Just make sure you call them instead!
  5. Recruitment is easy and anyone can do it. (via @simonlewisomj and @nataliejayw )NO IT ISN'T >> as much as people think recruiters have an easy job making loads of ££££, they are sadly mistaken. Good recruiters are much sought after, because of their vast range of skills. Bad recruiters lack many core skills including communication, listening and relationship building. They should re-train as estate agents or car salesman where they would be better suited!!
  6. There is a war for talent. (via @mervyndinnen) Mervyn, obviously believes this is a myth - the only myth I would like to de-bunk is that the war for talent has never stopped - it has always been hard to find good people (SEE No.5)
  7. Recruiters are heartless sales people. (via @nataliejayw) & @callumsaunders She is right they are not (well not all of them anyway!) There are many that will listen, help and advise job seekers without having to be asked. I for one have taken the time to help as many people as I could, with free and useful tips and advice about finding a new job. A good number of recruiters do actually care.
  8. Recruitment is just a sales business. (via @mervyndinnen) It is a sales business, of course, but it is so much more than that, and just because you can sell a product, doesn't mean you will succeed in dealing with the most unique product of all - one that answers back!!
  9. Recruiters work on commission and therefore are only concerned about money. (via @callumsaunders) This is a biggy! Many recruiters are motivated by many other things, not just the money they can earn. Yes of course it comes into it, but many are driven by achievement and satisfaction as well.
  10. Social media will change recruitment for ever. (via @alcartwright & @garyfranklin ) They both believe that it is over hyped and that recruitment via social media channels won't fundamentally change recruitment. (I actually disagree, I think it has done already - but that is another day's post).
  11. LinkedIn is the holy grail for resourcing. (via @jamesswift) Absolutely. There is so much more to resourcing than relying on one channel - however good it is. Just don't forget your own databases and the work you have done to build your own candidate communities - they are vital to the lifeblood of it.
  12. Recruitment is a complex process that needs managing by experts. (via @grahamsalisbury ) Recruitment is a straightforward process as Graham says, but while experts aren't needed, competent recruitment professionals are. Certainly over-complication is not needed.
  13. Online recruitment will take over the role of recruitment agencies. (via @keithpotts ) Complete load of trash - they work hand in hand together, end of story!!
  14. There is never enough talent. (via @garyfranklin) Rubbish - there is always enough talent - you just need to know where to look!!
  15. Recruitment consultants generally add enough value to justify the fee. (via @grahamruddick) The recession has proved that many companies have seen through some of the crap service some of the agencies have been giving their clients. No longer will agencies get away with just post adds on jobboards, giving then the best four candidates and charging a full fee.<
  16. A sourcer is a junior recruiter. (via @thesourceress) This is such a simple response - they are not!! They are a separate and sought after stand alone skill.
  17. Placing a job spec for a recruitment advert will do.  (via @andsomepeople )No it won't - it is just damn lazy and short sighted! You need to write different types of advert copy for different mediums.
  18. Recruiters are brand and HR experts as well. (via @mattalder) Why would they be? Just because you work in recruitment, it doesn't make you automatically qualified to be a brand, marketing or HR expert.
  19. One man band recruitment companies are cowboys. (via @cloudninerec) This is complete rubbish - many of the best consultants out there work for themselves and provide a superb service to their clients. It is the service not the size that counts.
  20. Recruiters are as bad as estate agents. I absolutely hate this general sweeping statement that I hear from people. In every industry there are good and bad examples of poor performers. Judge recruiters by your own experiences, don't be a lemming and jump on this bandwagon. There are plenty of good recruiters and estate agents out there, you just need to find the right one for you!

Thanks to everyone that joined in the debate on Twitter, and sorry if you didn't make the list above, but I had to draw a line somewhere.

Well there you go - some for to agree with and some, no doubt , you will disagree with! Please do, as this is what it is all about. The debate starts here (well actually in the comments below!)

And of course if I have missed any out, then please tell me below!!

RSS logo cup

If you like reading this blog, then click on the orange RSS icon here and get the latest Sirona Says posts delivered to your RSS reader or your inbox the moment they come out.

  • CloudNineRec

    Good selection of traditional myths there, most of which get my vote.
    War for talent - a myth? - I disgaree there. The changing face of client demands and expectations on recruitment agencies in a high umemployment market, means that recruiters have to trawl through an awful lot of CVs to find the `real` talent. I believe it is now harder than ever to find the right person - because they are increasingly the proverbial needle in a haystack.

    Good work Andy.

  • Stephenodonn

    1. We are working exclusively with this client. (Chances are, you are the Trojan Horse to gain access to that client)
    2. We don’t negotiate on fees. (Hahahaha)
    3. Recruitment agencies find jobs for candidates (No, they find candidates for employers)
    4. All recruiters are the same. (No, some are experts in their field with a vast contact list, and intimate knowledge of which jobs are about to become available - some are paper shufflers)
    5. “We’ll keep your details, and call when something suitable comes up”. (No they won’t. A candidate has to maintain regular contact with their recruiter, without being a pest.
    6. All the jobs you want are on our website. (Even the biggest job boards - and agencies - only have a fraction of all advertised jobs)
    7. Our website/ agency/ job board etc etc is No1. (This is only usually true in the minds of those saying it, and sometimes not even then)

  • Gareth Jones

    Nice list Andy - one hell of a lot of myths flying about! Would like to make one comment though and thats on the War for Talent (Yawn!) issue. I’m with Mervyn on this one - its a complete misnomer and there is no shortage of talent out there, we have just done a really poor job of finding it and nurturing it. Its become such a turgid and over used phrase, jumped on by both recruiters and HR alike.

    The cold truth is that most people have not even read the original paper from McKinsey, let alone really understand what it means. Dont believe me? Well next time someone trots out the phrase, ask them what the key points McKinsey were trying to make in the article and watch for the blank look, or listen out for some feeble attempt at a cover up - “eeerrr… that there is a shortage of talent?”

    No. Not even close. Whilst they might have been suggesting that there would be a reduction in overall numbers of “executive talent” (Somthing that has yet to be statistically proven by the way) There core proposition centred around three key points:

    1) Why would someone really good want to join your company?

    2) How will you keep them for more than a few years?

    3) Yes, Money does matter!

    They key point was how are you going to shape up in terms of being a credible employer, not that there will suddenly be a lack of capable people. A subtle, but very important difference and one that has been missed by so many simply because we jumped on yet another bloody jargon bandwagon.

    We are surrounded by talent. Its not obvious, but we have been looking through the wrong lense to see it. The global economy has been run by the so called best ‘talent’and look where that got us.

    No there is no shortage of talent. And a war? Cobblers. Just typical excuses and innapropriate use of words and themes. What really happened/is happening is that employers have single handedly failed in two areas:

    1) Attracting good people - creating the compelling reason for me to want to work in your company

    2) Recognising and making the best of who they already have.

    Innevitably i blogged on the subject lat year - 😉 - see link below if you are interested in my further ramblings!

    https://garethmjones.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/talent-management-the-emperors-not-so-new-clothes/

  • Vanessa Meyer

    Great post. I have a particular gripe with the photo on CV point. As a Canadian, I have been raised to format my CV so that only content that is a “bona fide occupational requirement” must appear on the CV. Therefore, a recruiter by law can not ask for my picture, marital status, age, sex, even my name if I don’t want to give it and it does not have any relation to how well I can perform the job.

    Of course you learn most of this information once you invite the person to an interview, but in Canada we recognize the huge potential for discrimination and bias when a photo is on a CV. As much as we like to think we are not prejudice, everyone suffers from the “similar to me effect”, and in a recruiting realm this is a very dangerous game — also why so many companies wonder why they lack diversity in their staff.

    I did a lot of promotional work during school and was asked for my photo a few times, I flat out refused. Although I can see the argument for pre-screening someone’s “look” for promotional and sales jobs, I also think its way more important that they be charismatic. And charisma has nothing to do with looks.

    We should all take a stand against photos on CVs!

  • Andy Headworth

    Hasn’t ‘war for talent’ always been there? It is a quasi myth derived by the media to coin a skill shortage. It is only a myth that it never went away!

  • Andy Headworth

    Stephen,

    How could I forget your No.2 ? <<

  • Andy Headworth

    Gareth,

    I agree totally - The myth of ‘war for talent’ is that is has never gone away! As long as I have been in recruitment, people have always complained about the lack of good people. Isn’t that why the recruitment industry has grown so big?

    Trouble is, as we come out of a recession, I am not actually sure that employers have learned anything about their talent!

    (It is a good blog that you wrote on the subject, and more companies should take note!)

  • Andy Headworth

    Vanessa,

    Totally agree with you, but it amazes me that so many career coaches and CV advisors still recommend putting photos on them. It can only be that they ahve never actually been in recruitment (client side or agency side). If they did then they will know that putting a photo on a CV is just asking to cause a potential of discrimination!

    Interesting, a client of mine in Spain actually has a complete opposite opinion. Over there, it appears to have been ‘tradition’ to enclose a photo, and they get chatsised when they don’t! >> I must point out their employment discrimination laws are not so defined as the UK!! (or they just don’t care!!)

  • Campustocareer.wordpress.com

    Andy,

    Well said! Great insight from a lot of people. Isn’t it great to see how people come out of the wordwork to help another person? Crowdsourcing….beautiful.

    I’m definitely going to pass this information along to my peers and throughout my network. Thanks for keeping it simple and to the point!

    Keep up the great work.

    Kind regards,

    Kirk Baumann
    https://campustocareer.wordpress.com
    /in/kbaumann

  • Will

    recruiters work in business, not in charity. All thee above is a little driven by a personal problem. Bottom line - if you’re a good candidate you will be placed. If you’re not, you won’t - you won’t be called back, you’ll take it personally and you’ll end up spending the time writing this; time you would be spending working and focussing on building you career - if you were a good candidate.
    Build a bridge, get over it, etc, yawn.

  • steve

    As someone who had worked through agencies before my experiences with them have led me to never carry out agency work again.
    Here is a list of stuff I came across regularly over a period of 4 years.
    1. timesheets being misplaced by consultants which resulted in me having to wait a further week for my wages - this usually happened when the work was back breaking, where agencies had a high turnover of staff who left after a week or so, one consultant whom I went out for a few pints with admitted that he did this to ensure that workers who were hacked off with these demanding jobs worked an extra week in order to get the pay they were owed.
    2. I was promised work in Bristol by three agencies during a twelve month period, there was never any work after the sign up despite my experience and qualifications, but the consultants got their sign up commission, it got to the point where would ask to see the jobs written down on paper before I registered, a lot of consultancies refused to do this.
    3. One of the longer established agencies Ranstad told myself and a friend that as part of looking after us that would take us out for a pint every other week, all we ever got was a few cheapo bottles of duty free lager from Aldi, this didnt bother me such, but it would been better if they were honest about this.

    cheers Steve

  • Andy Headworth

    Too many bad experiences by the sound of it Steve - I don’t blame you for feeling the way you do.
    I hope that over the next few years as the industry changes, more and more of these idiots leave the business. They aren’t good for anyone!

  • Katharine

    From my own experience, recruitment agencies are an awful channel to use to find work. During my 20 year career, I have found work by contacting companies directly, whereas agencies have proved to be next to useless. They were slightly better when I lived in Holland, but in the UK? Forget it. Speaking from the other end of the spectrum, as the hiring manager, I have also found them to be left wanting. And have again had more luck liaising directly with the internal HR department to fulfil departmental needs.
    I have even removed myself from Linkedin. It used to be a fantastic tool, but unfortunately it has turned from professional site to just another social networking website, falling short of what it was originally designed for.
    I got so fed up with agencies contacting me with non existence job offers purely to gain access to my work contacts and meet their own KPI’s, I came off of it, and I am far from the only one to have done so. I still maintain my genuine work contacts, I’ve just avoided the cheap sales tactics used by agents today.

  • Katharine

    Ah, the unmistakable arrogance of youth and inexperience talking here I see, bless him.

    Still, not so sure of himself as to mention the name of the company he works along with his bold words.

  • Pingback: 56 Most Popular Job Search Blog Posts of 2010 | JobMob()